Thursday, 25 December 2008

Merry Christmas!

I want to wish everyone a safe passage as you journey to spend time with friends and family this Christmas.
Posted by brians at 7:00 AM in Announcements

Wednesday, 24 December 2008

Beshear Has A Good Idea

Because of the slow news cycle this time of the year, I get the opportunity to go back and catch up on some stories I didn't get a chance to comment on the first time around. And I wanted to congratulate Beshear on creating a Commission on Philanthropy.
“State government can’t meet the demand for all the services required by the people of Kentucky, not under the current economic conditions,” Beshear said. “We need partners now more than ever, and we must continue to find ways to be responsive to Kentucky families and move the state forward. The time is right to join forces in an unprecedented effort for the greater good of the commonwealth.”
I think this is a brilliant idea. Think of all of the liberals in this state that believe government is the answer and desire higher taxation. This is a perfect opportunity for them to give to the cause of government. If all of them gave just a few extra hundred dollars each we could overcome our budget shortfall.

Why do I have the feeling that few if any of them will actually give? Oh thats right,  they want to spend "other people's money" and not necessarily their own. If government was such a source of good you think they would all just give more money to the cause rather than force others to give at gun point. Doesn't this smell a bit of hypocrisy? So I give Beshear credit for a good idea. He has found an excelent means of highlighting the shear surreptitiousness of those on the left.
Posted by brians at 11:08 AM in Kentucky Politics

Monday, 22 December 2008

Bunning Non Story

I have to hand it to the drive by media. They sure know how to smear Republicans over non stories. The latest target of a drive by smear is Sen Bunning. This time it is over Jim Bunning's Charitable Foundation.

The nonprofit Jim Bunning Foundation, set up in 1996 to collect money the Hall of Fame pitcher gets from autographing baseball memorabilia, has taken in more than $504,000, the Lexington Herald-Leader reported yesterday, citing Senate and tax records.

Of that amount, Bunning has earned $180,000 in salary, the newspaper said. By contrast, the foundation has given $136,435, or about one-fourth of its income, to churches and charitable groups around Northern Kentucky.

By skimming the article you get the impression that Bunning is earning a $180,000 yearly salary from the foundation. But that isn't the case. His charity in the last 12 years has raised $504,000. That came directly from money Bunning made signing baseball memorabilia after he obtained a spot in the hall of fame. That comes to roughly $42,000 a year in money raised by Bunning. Of that money he took about $15,000 a year in salary. $12,000 was donated directly to charities while the final $15,000 was being held to create an endowment.

$15,000 a year is not exactly a monstrous salary. And a lot less sensational than $180,000 in salary. Of course the paper doesn't break it down into yearly toals. Instead they use some person from the American Institute of Philanthropy in Chicago to smear his charity.
"For him to be taking more for himself than he gives to the charities just doesn't look good, no matter how you cut it," said Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy in Chicago.
While he technically took in more money than he gave in charity, he is only taking about 1/3 of the money raised for salary. The rest will eventually end up going to charity. While a 33% overhead is not awesome, it is well within the range of acceptable overhead for charitable organizations.
Charity watchdog groups say it's acceptable for an agency to spend as much as 40 percent on overhead.
My favorite part of the story is the last line.
Bunning started his foundation with the approval of the Senate ethics committee and the IRS
So what is the big deal? He has a charity where the overhead is considered reasonable and it was cleared by the Senate ethics committee and the IRS. Why is this even a story? Oh yeah, I forgot. He is a Republican up for re-election in 2 years and they need to start slimining him whenever they can.
Posted by brians at 5:37 PM in Kentucky Politics

Thursday, 18 December 2008

FedEx Suxor

Nothing causes me to cringe more than knowing some item I bought online is set to be delivered by FedEx. One never knows when the package will actually arrive. Yesterday is a perfect example. I had been waiting a few days for something I bought. I was excited to learn that it was out on the truck for delivery. Instead of going into the office, I decided to way for the FedEx guy to deliver it.

I waited all day and no one showed up with the package. At 6, I checked the status again and was treated to the following message.
Delivery exception - Local weather delay, delivery attempted
What? The roads were fine yesterday. All of the inclement weather went north of us. I might even have given them some slack if they hadn't delivered a package the day before when the weather was actually BAD. My guess is the day was coming to an end and the driver hadn't made his rounds so he used it as an excuse to not deliver the package.

If this was an isolated incident I could forgive them. But this is the second time it has happened to me. A couple of years ago, I was at the office on a Friday waiting for courseware that I needed for a class I was teaching the following Monday to arrive. There were multiple people in the office the entire day, but at 5:50pm that evening a message popped up on the web site that no one was available to receive the package. What? We were there ALL day. I even made sure someone was in the office during the lunch hour. I was pissed and had to go by the FedEx distribution center on Saturday to pick up the package.

I have had other encounters with FedEx, but none as aggregious as that Friday and yesterday. Anyway, if you want a package delivered on time, you are better off going with any carrier other than FedEx.
Posted by brians at 9:43 AM in Announcements

Another Myth of Global Warming

CNN produced more dire global warming predictions yesterday.
Melting ice, especially in Greenland and the Arctic, is also thought to contribute to global warming, Zwally said. When the vast ice sheets and glaciers melt, they lose their reflective power, and instead, oceans and land absorb the heat, causing the Arctic waters and the atmosphere to warm faster.
So melting ice in the Arctic is causing seas to rise? Really? As water turns from liquid to a solid, it expands and becomes LESS dense. This is the reason why ice floats within water. The increased size of the solid form means that ice actually takes up more volume than its liquid form. Therefore the water levels are higher with ice in it because the ice displaces more water.

Don't believe me? Here is a simple experiment you can try at home. Take a clear glass and fill it 2/3 of the way with ice. Then fill the glass with enough water to make sure the ice is floating. Take a piece of tape and mark the water level. Come back in an hour or two after the ice has melted and note the water level. It will have gone down. If the ice in the Arctic is melting then sea levels should be going down and not up!

But hey, we shouldn't use reality to get in the way of a good scare story.
Posted by brians at 9:28 AM in Political Issues

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

Full Court Press On Tax Increases

I love it! We are getting a bunch of doom and gloom articles about the disaster that will befall state government if they can't find "new revenue streams". Either that or articles promoting the benefits of a tax increase.
Give me a break! Oh no, some parks may have to close or people may have to be let go. I know it sucks, but if the state can't afford it then those steps will have to be taken. It is just that simple. A businesses can't spend money it doesn't have. Why shouldn't state government also be forced to live within its means. If they hadn't spent like drunk sailors during the good years then we would have plenty of reserves to get through the down times.  We are being forced to pay for the fiscal irresponsibility of years past. That is just the reality of the situation.

New taxes are not the solution. Republicans know this and should oppose such a move in a bear market. But! If I were David Williams I would be coming up with a list of Republican priorities that the Democrats have blocked the last few years and bring them to the bargaining table. If the Democrats want a new revenue stream as much as they are squawking, then they are going to have to pass some Republican issues. And not small issues but big issues like right to work laws. If we have to have the new revenue streams then we should expect reasonable compromises to make sure Government doesn't disintegrate.  If the Dems aren't willing to compromise then there is no reason for Republicans to vote for any tax increase.

I look forward to legislative session next year. It should be a good year for conservative interests.

Posted by brians at 6:17 PM in Kentucky Politics

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

From The Duh Files

I know this will come as a shock to many, but the 8664 plan will lead to an increase of traffic in downtown Louisville.
The alternative to the Ohio River Bridges Project known as “8664” would lead to increased traffic congestion, higher emissions and longer delays than the federal plan to build two new bridges and reconfigure Spaghetti Junction, a state study has found.
For me, this falls into the "duh category". By removing one of the main arteries to downtown, you are going to increase traffic on other downtown roads. This is just plain common sense. Traffic is an ever growing constant. If you remove a part of 64 the traffic has to go somewhere. That somewhere is the other roads in downtown Louisville. While 8664 might beautify the downtown landscape it will do nothing to alleviate Louisville's traffic problems. In fact it will only make the problem worse.
Posted by brians at 9:34 PM in Louisville Politics

Why Are Democratic Leaders Economic Idiots

Illustrious Louisville Mayor for life, Jerry Abramson, will meet with Obama this week to discuss an economic stimulus plan. Here are the details as reported by the Courier Journal.
Louisville Mayor Jerry Abramson will meet Thursday with members of President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team to discuss an economic stimulus package that would create jobs by investing billions of dollars in roads, schools and other city construction projects.

Abramson, one of dozens of leaders from the U.S. Conference of Mayors invited to attend, will meet in Chicago with presidential transition co-chair Valerie Jarrett.

“If our country is to rebound quickly from the economic recession, we must invest in the economic engines of America — our metropolitan areas,” Abramson said in a prepared statement. “An economic stimulus in cities will help put people to work, create new jobs and build and rebuild roads, bridges, schools and other projects that serve citizens.”
An economic stimulus plan WILL create new jobs, build roads, bridges and schools. But for every dollar we spend on an economic stimulus plan we are removing one dollar from the private sector. No matter how much Abramson deludes himself into believing that government is the "real" economic engine, it doesn't change the fact that the private sector is the primary economic driver in this country. All we are doing with these stupid stimulus packages is taking money from the private sector and moving it into the inefficient public sector. In effect creating some public sector jobs while destroying many more private sector jobs. On top of that we are stifling the natural recovery or our economy. It is simple economics 101. But it is apparently a difficult concept for Democratic leaders to grasp.

Posted by brians at 9:29 PM in Political Issues

Tragic Murder

21 year old Brittany Zimmerman was killed yesterday by a home invader near Wisconsin University. She was beaten, strangled, and stabbed multiple times.

Brittany Zimmerman, a 21-year-old college student who wanted to be a doctor, called 911 as she was being attacked by a stranger, police say.

Brittany Zimmerman's screams and struggle for her life were captured by a 911 tape.

But the police did not come for 48 minutes. By that time, Zimmerman was dead. Her fiance found her body.

Although the dispatcher claimed later to have heard nothing, the 911 tape captured screams, gasps and what sounds like a struggle, according to the court documents.

Spring was in the air when college student Zimmerman returned April 2 from classes at the University of Wisconsin to the off-campus apartment she shared with her fiance, Jordan Gonnering.

He was out when she arrived home. He discovered her body when he returned.

Zimmerman had been stabbed multiple times in her chest, near her heart. She'd also been beaten and strangled, according to warrants released recently.

Zimmerman managed to call 911 at 12:20 p.m. The call was taken by the Dane County 911 center and an internal investigation revealed the dispatcher did not hear any sounds that would signal an emergency.

Because of that, police were not sent to the apartment until 48 minutes after Zimmerman made the call. Her fiance was already there.

My prayers go out to her family, fiance, and friends.

While this story is horribly sad, I can't help but become angry because the whole situation didn't have to happen. If only she had owned a firearm and been properly trained in its usage. She could have fended off the attacker. Instead the police, who arrived 45 minutes after the 911 call, drew an outline of her body and began the search for the killer.

My only hope is people learn important lessons from this unfortunate tragedy. First of all, when an attacker enters your home their is nothing the police can do to protect you. It takes too long for them to respond. You must take your self defense into your own hands. 

Secondly, criminals don't need a gun to take your life. Brittany was killed by a knife. Criminalizing the possession of firearms for law abiding citizens will not stop these despicable attackers and will only disarm those who need that last line of defense.

Lastly, we have come to far away from out countries founding principle of self defense. A principle enshrined within our Constitution. It is time we stopped creating "gun free zones" and started showing students how to use guns safely to defend themselves. I have met to many people who have an irrational fear of firearms. We need to break through that fear at a younger age and make them comfortable firing a gun. In addition we should encourage responsible gun ownership so people have the tools to defend themselves when evil comes instead of deluding them into believing the state will protect them.

Posted by brians at 9:25 PM in Political Issues

Monday, 15 December 2008

Obama Election Causes Run On Guns And Ammo

I have seen a number of stories since the eleciton talking about the rising sales of fire arms and ammunition. I think it is funny that the media seems shocked by the development. It isn't surprising to see people buying guns in huge numbers after the election of the most liberal president ever. Especially after the gun bans put in place during the Clinton administration. The amusing thing is President Elect Obama came out to assure people he isn't going to take their guns away.

The rise in firearm purchases since the election prompted the president-elect to reassure gun owners during a press conference a week ago that he won't take away their weapons.

"I believe in common-sense gun safety laws and I believe in the Second Amendment," Obama said. "And so lawful gun owners have nothing to fear. I said that throughout the campaign. I haven't indicated anything different during the transition. I think people can take me at my word."

I like how he believes in "common-sense" gun laws. From a liberal, that means only a partial ban on weapons and ammunition. Personally, I don't blame people for going out and buying stuff while they still can. But I wouldn't go out and buy anything now. The high demand will cause prices to spike. I would wait until next year and buy the stuff when prices come back down. I plan on being one of those shopping. I have been wanting to buy a couple high capacity magazines for my Glock for the last year or two. I want to make sure I purchase them before they turn back up on some banned list.

The reason I believe it is safe to wait for now is I don't believe Obama will take on the NRA and gun rights in the next year. I think he wants to socialize health care and create a new "New (Raw) Deal". Both those items will be his highest priority in the first year. Why would he blow his mandate tussling with the NRA when there are much easier targets?

I also don't forsee gun bans during his first administration. What I look to happen is attempts to make ammunition horribly expensive. I see efforts to mandate the micro-stamping of ammunition. A process that would cause manufacturers to put unique identification on ammunition cases to make them traceable. A move that would cause the prices of ammo to sky rocket as ammunition companies would have to retool to support it. I imagine that not all companies could afford the cost of retooling and will just go out of business from the law.

I also wouldn't be surprised to see them raise taxes on ammunition as a way to "raise revenue" to pay for some program. Of course if their is a tragedy like VT or Columbine, then all bets are off. They might once again try to get some type of comprehensive gun ban. But unless a tragedy occurs, I don't see it as an agenda item in his first term. Now if we are unlucky enough to see a second Obama term, I think we very well could see a more concerted effort to ban guns.

So for now, wait until next year to buy your guns and ammo. But don't wait to long, because I suspect we will see major encroachments on the second amendment (sessible gun laws) a year or two from now.

Posted by brians at 9:20 PM in National Politics

Online Gambling Case Goes Before Appeals Court

The idiotic case of the Beshear administration's attempts to seize domain names has made it to the appeals court.

Lawyers representing online gambling interests told the Kentucky Court of Appeals on Friday that Gov. Steve Beshear’s effort to seize domain names is blatantly unconstitutional.

A three-judge panel is weighing Beshear’s unprecedented move to seize the domain names of 141 gambling Web sites.

Franklin Circuit Judge Thomas Wingate allowed the Cabinet for Justice and Public Safety to seize the domain names last month. The seizure, at this point, is meaningless because the state cannot control the content of the Web sites until a judge orders the domain names forfeited to the state.

This is a chance for the court to throw this stupid case out with prejudice. It is beyond belief that it has already made it this far in the legal process. The attempt by the state to take domains names is silly. As we have pointed out before, domain names are just pointers to network addresses. A short cut that allows people to remember the address for a specific computer. Seizing them makes no sense as anyone can reach the gambling servers by using their network address directly.

Hopefully the idiocy driving this case ends here before Kentucky becomes an international laughing stock. If this case makes it past the appeals court, we will well deserve our image as a backwater state in the U.S. Not to mention the fact that it will severely discourage technical companies from moving to Kentucky. Would you want to move to a state which has so little understanding of technology? Let's hope for the best.
Posted by brians at 9:20 PM in Kentucky Politics

Saturday, 13 December 2008

Let's See How Bad The Democrats Want The Cigarette Tax Increase

Looks like the Democrats are going to go "all in" on a cigarette tax increase in the January session. At first, I was opposed from the grounds that it is stupid to raise taxes during a down turn in the economy. First it will not raise the revenue expected and secondly, it slams people who are already having trouble making ends meet. But then I thought about it some more and wondered, how bad do the Democrats want this tax increase?

The GOP in the senate hold all the cards in this game. If I were David Williams I would offer my support for the tax increase only if the Democrats agree to the following concessions.
  1. Pass a right to work law in Kentucky. It would immediately open us up for competition to bring more jobs to Kentucky.
  2. Get rid of the CATS grading system. It is a pointless exercise that tells us little about the progress kids are making against the rest of the nation. Replace it with a national testing system.
I am sure the GOP in the senate can come up with some more plum Republican priorities that they would like to get passed as well. As far as I am concerned the sky is the limit. I think it is only fair that the Democrats compromise. Especially if they want Republicans to vote for an onerous tax increase. So let's find out how bad they really want that new tax. If they are willing to pass significant Republican proposals then I might be willing to favor an increase in the cigarette tax. If not then it should be DOA.
Posted by brians at 9:05 PM in Kentucky Politics

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Smoking Police Are Back

When it comes to liberty, if you give an inch, they will take a mile. The latest example is the smoking police. First they wanted to ban smoking inside because of the dangers of second hand smoke. Unfortunately, we capitulated and now we get to face the next step. Smoking bans outside. The latest is the University of Kentucky. They are planning a campus wide smoking ban.
The University of Kentucky may ban smoking on all campus property, including outdoors, as early as next fall, President Lee Todd announced today.

UK would join Campbellsville University as the only other campus in Kentucky to enact a complete smoking ban, according to the American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation.

UK already bans smoking indoors and outside its medical facilities.

“I think there clearly are indications that second-hand smoke is an issue,” Todd said after a UK Board of Trustees meeting. “And I do think that smoking is a health hazard.”
Second hand smoke outside? That is ridiculous. It is out freaking doors! Smoke dissipates almost immediately outdoors. The risk of second hand smoke outside is nil! No this is just another case of the thought police deciding something is bad for you. Even if it is a legal product. Why don't they just vote to make tobacco illegal and then we don't have to deal with these stupid rationalizations for stripping our freedoms.
Posted by brians at 11:29 PM in Kentucky Politics

Moberly To Tax Payers: Screw You!

The latest government whiner is House Budget Chairman, Harry Moberly.
Moberly, D-Richmond, said the shortfall could be addressed only with cuts but that approach “would be too painful” and the state would “seriously cripple” important programs.
So what does he propose? You might guess it. Tax increases. Let me get this straight. We are in an economic downturn. A time when tax payers are struggling to make ends meet. And Mr Government Moberly wants to increase our tax burden so we have even less money. For what purpose? So he can continue to live high on the hog in state government. So government doesn't have to face pain. To hell with that! It's better for government to feel the pain rather than us tax payers. I hope the Republicans stand firm against tax increases this coming session. It's time that the government did with less and not the tax payers.

Posted by brians at 11:19 PM in Kentucky Politics

Tuesday, 9 December 2008

Government Leaders Whine Like Two Year Olds

If anyone is  following the news recently, one can't miss all of the stories about how devastating cuts will be to government. The latest government leader promising woe is the Commissioner of Education.
A 4 percent state funding cut this year would have a "devastating" impact on Kentucky's public schools, Education Commissioner Jon Draud said yesterday.
Give me a break. Every time their is a chance at a budgetary cut, these people talk about how horrible the results will be. I have an idea. Suck it up! Businesses have ups and downs. They don't get the ever expanding budgets that government get regardless of performance. My company had to cut back during the downturn of 2002. I had to get rid of people and it was horrible, but it wasn't devastating to my business. Was it a set back? Yes. Devastating? No. Why? Because I still had a core of good people to work through the bad times and start growing again.

These government types should stop acting like it is the end of the world and start looking at this as an opportunity. An opportunity to cut out the weak links in their organizations. An opportunity to stream line services. An opportunity to make their government agency more efficient. That is a heck of a lot better than whining about how difficult it will be.
Posted by brians at 11:08 PM in Kentucky Politics

Buying An Election 101

If you want to be a Judge, all you have to do is buy it. Looks like the going rate for an unqualified candidate is $300,000. That is exactly what 29 year old Katie King did. More unbelievably, she lent herself almost $200,000 for the election.

New Jefferson District Judge Katie King lent her own campaign $194,000 in the two weeks immediately before and after the November election, according to her filings with the Kentucky Registry of Election Finance.

King was the subject of a number of news stories which raised questions about her qualifications, leading up to her face off with David Holton. King won the race and has been sworn in as district judge. Records show King raised just $8000 in the 15 days before the election, but pitched in $194,000 of her own money to pay the campaign's bills. King is the daughter of Metro Council President and Louisville bank founder Jim King. He told me the campaign money came out of Katie's pocket, not his. Katie King reported raising and spending a total of $303,000 for her campaign. Holton's post-election report is not available though his campaign consultant says Holton raised a little over $100,000.

Amazing. King spent $200,000 for a job that pays just over $100,000. Not a bad investment. She will make her money back by the end of her first term. What I want to know is how the heck does a 29 year old got $200,000 to spend on the election in the first place? Do assistant district attorneys make a lot more money than I believed? Or maybe she has been saving her pennies every day since she was a little girl? For some reason, I don't believe either theory. The only place that type of money was available to her was through her daddy, Jim King. I love how he claims it wasn't his money. Yeah, that is almost believable.

What I want to know is when did he giver her the money? Was it a trust set up a long time ago or did he just give it to her in the last year or two. If it is the latter, then they could have possibly violated campaign finance laws. I doubt we will ever know.

Posted by brians at 11:08 PM in Louisville Politics

Monday, 8 December 2008

The Good, The Bad, and The Clueless

As we get ready for the new year and a new legislative session, we are beginning to get an feel for how the Beshear administration is going to attack the new year. First let's start with the good.
Gov. Steve Beshear doesn’t want Kentucky to borrow its way out of a nearly half-billion-dollar shortfall by issuing bonds, he said.
This is an excellent decision. There is no reason for us to go into hock because we come up short for a year or two. It is much better to tighten the belt and spend less than it is to keep on spending money like they do on the national level. That way we will be in a much stronger position whenever the economy does recover.

I wish all I had was good news. Unfortunately, it looks like Beshear is going to try to do some really stupid things. It appears that he is set on trying to pass a cigarette tax hike. This is a bad idea for two reasons. First off, it is a really regressive tax. It will put an additional squeeze on poor people just as the economy is beginning to flounder. Secondly, it will not generate the revenue they say it will because people will stop using the product. I feel sorry for people that smoke. They are being assaulted on all sides. Both through higher taxation and restrictions on where they can partake in their vice.

On top of that, Beshear is against repealing the prevailing wage law.
Steve Beshear told me (Mark Hebert) today that repealing the union-backed wage law is "off the table" as far as he's concerned. Beshear isn't convinced that repealing the law would save much money and he says it could hurt the quality of construction on government financed projects.
This has to be a joke right? We are in a financial pinch right now, and he doesn't want to take a step that will save us, by his own admission, money? I guess taking care of his own includes his buddies in big labor and not us tax payers. My favorite part is that it wil l hurt the quality of construction. Yeah, union construction is just so much more superior to non-union construction. Just look at the quality differences between the Big 3 automotive companies and say Toyota and Honda.

But remember the efficiency study that was going to save us all of that money? Well the results must not have gone all that well. He is now begging the people of the Commonwealth for ideas on how to save money.

During his 2007 campaign, Gov. Steve Beshear pledged to save Kentucky taxpayers $150 million to $180 million a year by finding greater efficiencies in state government.

Now — one year into his term, grappling with a projected $456 million budget shortfall — Beshear is asking taxpayers for their cost-cutting ideas.

The Beshear administration says it’s already saving an undetermined sum thanks to thousands of useful efficiency suggestions submitted by state workers over the past year, such as canceling newspaper subscriptions (the same news stories are available for free on the Web), shrinking the state vehicle fleet through two surplus auctions and reducing some laundry and cleaning services from weekly to monthly.

Starting this month, Kentuckians can offer their own suggestions to the governor’s Office of Innovation, Economy and Efficiency, said Finance and Administration Secretary Jonathon Miller on Wednesday.

Anyone interested should visit www.OpenDoor.KY.gov and click on the compact fluorescent light bulb, Miller said.

Awesome! These people are completely clueless. I like the fact that they have saved an undetermined amount already. Let me translate for you. Not much. If it was saving a lot of money they would have a figure trotted out by now. I love the fact that they are oping to save $100 million dollars from suggestions made by the general public. It is going to be a fun 2009!

PS - Gov Beshear, I have an idea on how to get people involved in coming up with cost savers. Give them a cut of the money their idea saves. If you save the state $100,000 then you get to keep say $25,000 of the savings. Heck I would even work on coming up with cost saving ideas if it meant money for myself.
Posted by brians at 10:59 PM in Kentucky Politics

Thursday, 4 December 2008

Don't These People Have Anything Better To Do

I am constantly amazed at some lawsuits that occur in our increasingly litigious society. The latest comes from a bunch of atheists are suing Kentucky over a Kentucky Homeland Security law.

An atheists-rights group is suing the Kentucky Office of Homeland Security because state law requires the agency to stress “dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth.”

American Atheists of Parsippany, N.J., and 10 non-religious Kentuckians are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, set to be filed Tuesday in Franklin Circuit Court...

...The requirement to credit God for Kentucky’s protection was tucked into 2006 homeland security legislation by state Rep. Tom Riner, D-Louisville, a Southern Baptist minister.

“This is recognition that government alone cannot guarantee the perfect safety of the people of Kentucky,” Riner said last week.

Riner said he expects Homeland Security to include language recognizing God’s benevolent protection in its official reports and other materials – sometimes the agency does, and sometimes it doesn’t – and to maintain a plaque with that message at the state’s Emergency Operations Center in Frankfort.

Personally, I think these atheists are a bit short sighted. I know they don't believe in a God, but what if one does exists? Wouldn't we be better off asking that deity for help in securing our society and being thankful for its help? I would think we could use all of the help we can get in defending ourself from terrorists.

I also think they don't have a lot of standing on this lawsuit. Asking and recognizing God's help in protecting us doesn't sound like a state run religion. In fact I don't see it as all that different from having "In God We Trust" on our money. Aside from the religious  vs government aspect of this case, I was really galled to learn the real reason for the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs ask for the homeland security law to be stripped of its references to God. They also ask for monetary damages, claiming to have suffered sleeping disorders and “mental pain and anguish.”

“Plaintiffs also suffer anxiety from the belief that the existence of these unconstitutional laws suggest that their very safety as residents of Kentucky may be in the hands of fanatics, traitors or fools,” according to the suit.

Yup, that's right. They want free money. I am sure these people are "losing sleep" over this law. What kind of loser do you have to be to have trouble sleeping over this legislation. I don't agree with a lot that government does. Heck I am concerned about a number of people who are running this country, but I don't have trouble sleeping because of it. These people really need to find something do with their time rather than sitting around wallowing in victimization. I understand playing the victim is a favorite liberal past time, but these people really need to move past it and get on with their lives.

Posted by brians at 10:07 AM in Kentucky Politics

Tuesday, 2 December 2008

Brother Can You Spare A Dime

Am I the only one who thinks it is pathetic that Gov Beshear is going to the federal government groveling to be bailed out from his incompetent management of government funds?

When Gov. Steve Beshear joins other governors to meet with President-elect Barack Obama Monday night, he expects to make a pitch for a stimulus plan for states that could include cash to help struggling programs.

Beshear and other state leaders are scheduled to sit down with Obama in Philadelphia, first at an informal session Monday evening, then in a formal conference Tuesday morning, Beshear said.

“We’re going to be talking about a number of possibilities to help us with this situation we find ourselves in,” Beshear said. “Obviously an infrastructure stimulus package would help Kentucky as well as other states in helping people get back to work.”

First off, I have to once again comment on his quote that an infrastructure stimulus package would put people back to work. It doesn't work that way. To pay for infrastructure package the money has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is from the taxpayers! By taking money from the taxpayers we are not stimulating anything. We are just moving money from the efficient private sector to the inefficient public sector. That will only HURT the economy. Sigh...

Why is it that Democrats always look to for more government money to solve problems? Beshear is a pefect example. He has failed to pass legalized gambling. A move that was going to generate millions in revenue. He has failed in his attempts to raise taxes. Now he is going to the Federal government and look for handouts.

Why doesn't he do the right thing and look at restructuring state government. This is an ideal time to return to the basics of good government. It is time to look at all areas of state government and ask the simple question. Do we really need this program?  Secondly, we need to look at streamlining state government. We need to ask two questions. What can we do to make government agencies more efficient? How we can we re-structure the state employee program to promote effective people and fire those who aren't cutting it? The time has come that we measured productivity within state government and make decisions based upon the resutls. Just because state government isn't a private venture, doesn't mean that the measurements that are used in business can't be applied to state government. Heck by just measuring productivity we might find a number of areas were we can cut back.

The funny thing is if we do the hard work now, we will be well poised when the economy recovers to see a huge surplus. One that can be applied to successful programs that are underfunded or given back to the taxpayers. If we fail to act, we will be forced to limp from year to year hoping the economy recovers or waiting for the federal government to bail us out from our problems. Screw that! Let's do the right thing now and get to work.
Posted by brians at 10:37 PM in Kentucky Politics

Monday, 1 December 2008

BCS Appreciation Day

Last Saturday turned into BCS appreciation day as all of the possible results that would make the BCS look good happened. Oregeon St lost, Florida won, and Oklahoma won. Ugh!

We are left with only one more scenario that would make the BCS look bad. Florida and Oklahoma win their conference championship games and Texas finishes ahead of Florida in the BCS rankings. A result which would mean an OU/Texas rematch in the championship game. I have to believe that would make the BCS look stupid. Not only would a team who didn't "win" their conference make the championship game, the winner of the SEC would be snubbed. Especially since BCS proponents are talking about the SEC championship game as a "semi-final" game.

The BCS is assinine. It has no logical reason for being. My favorite argument for the BCS is that every week during the season is a playoff. If that is true, how come Florida wasn't eliminated after they lost to Mississippi? How come Oklahoma wasn't eliminated when they lost to Texas? How come Texas wasn't eliminated after they lost to Texas Tech? Who eliminated Utah, Boise State, and Ball State? No the BCS is some crappy concoction to keep bowl games and make money for the schools. Oh yeah and to annoint the MNC (Mythical National Champion).
Posted by brians at 5:23 AM in Sports Topics
« December »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031