Wednesday, 22 April 2009
The Latest Media Attack on Bunning
U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning's fundraising report could have been worse, but it's hard to figure out how.
In terms he's sure to understand, at a time he needed to strike out the side, the old right-hander just loaded the bases for the Democrats.
His anemic fundraising in the first quarter of 2009 came at a time when, in light of sagging poll numbers and concerns about his ability to find contributors, he needed to show that he is viable.The $263,000 he reported raising doesn't do that.
"There was a time when a quarter of a million was a lot of money," said political analyst Stuart Rothenberg. "Not any more."
What has to have the Republican powers -- the ones who seemingly have been trying to dry up Bunning's fundraising for months -- especially concerned is the fact that both big-name Democratic contenders had pretty good weeks last week.
Why is there all of a sudden concern about Bunning's viability? It seems to me that the media would love it if Bunning can't raise any money. Why would they want to portray him as vulnerable and someone who maybe should get out of the race. I suspect there is a reason for this switch in tone.
First of all, they want Bunning to face a primary battle. The Democrats are going to have a bloody primary which drains both campaign funds. If Bunning doesn't face a primary challenge, then he can spend all of his time hording money for the general. With the primary being in late May, the Democratic winner won't have a lot of time to raise money for the fall contest.
I believe the media hopes that by talking about Bunning's weakness that a Republican like David Williams or Trey Grayson will enter the race. A position that will put the Republicans in the same position as the Democrats. More importantly, I think they see it as an opportunity to weaken the Republican nominee. They saw how divisive the Republicans became after the gubernatorial primary last year, and they want the same thing to happen here.
They need Republicans to be divided because they aren't going to be able to win on the issues. They especially don't want the Democrats to face someone with Bunning's record. Think about it. Obama lost Kentucky by 20 points to McCain and now the Democrat who wins the primary is going to have defend the President's positions. Which one of them are going to be winners?
Obama's stimulus, budget and the continuation of Bush's bailouts are mounting an incredible amount of debt. All of which Bunning opposed. How many Kentuckians are going to support this massive increase in debt?
Obama wants to impose cap and trade to help pay for his proposals. A move that would cause the average Kentuckian's electric bill to double or even tripple since most of our electricity comes from coal. Bunning has opposed it. How many Kentuckians are going to support a massive increase in cost of living?
Obama wants to socialize medicine. A move that will create a shortage of care and create long lines. Again Bunning opposes such a measure. How many Kentuckians are going to support socializing health care?
These will be the main issues during next year's election and Bunning will be on the right side of all of them and the Democratic contender will be left defending the national party. Bunning will have the wind at his back. All he has to do is raise $7 million in the next 16 months and he will have plenty of money to win the November election. Especially if the Demcorats engage in the type of brutal primary that I expect will occur.


